A 26-year-old woman has stunned the world after revealing she already has 22 biological children — and plans to have more than 100 before she is finished. Her story, shared in interviews and across social media, has triggered both fascination and outrage, with supporters calling her “supermom” while critics warn of exploitation and ethical chaos. The young mother, who lives with her wealthy partner, has become a global curiosity as people question how one family can even attempt such a staggering goal.
According to Reuters, the woman relies on surrogates to carry most of her children, though several were born naturally. She and her husband have invested millions in the process, paying agencies, nannies, and medical staff to coordinate what has become an industrial-scale family plan. Coverage by The New York Times noted that the couple owns a mansion with dozens of bedrooms, along with a rotating team of caretakers who manage feeding schedules, school plans, and round-the-clock healthcare. “We want the biggest family in the world,” she said proudly. “This is just the beginning.”
Her declaration sent social media into meltdown. Videos shared by @nexta_tv showed clips of the sprawling household, with rows of identical cribs lined up like a nursery ward. Some viewers reacted with awe, praising her ambition, while others expressed disgust, accusing the couple of treating children as collectibles. One critic told The Guardian the spectacle “feels less like a family and more like a business project.”
“A 26-year-old mom with 22 kids now vows to have more than 100. Social media is divided.”— @CityAlerts
Medical experts voiced alarm. Doctors interviewed by BBC warned that raising hundreds of children could strain not only finances but also emotional well-being. “Children need attention, not just money,” one pediatrician said. Others questioned the use of surrogacy on such a massive scale, with activists telling Human Rights Watch that women hired to carry the babies might face exploitation. Still, the young mother dismissed concerns. “We treat our surrogates with respect,” she insisted. “They are part of our family.”
For her supporters, the vision of a giant household is inspiring. Fans told AP News that her determination symbolized resilience in a time when many young people are delaying families altogether. “She’s proving that family still matters,” one admirer said. Others argued the criticism was fueled by jealousy. “People are just angry because they can’t imagine providing for so many,” one supporter posted. But critics countered that the children themselves may suffer, with too little individual time from their parents. Coverage in CNN highlighted experts warning of “identity crises” as the children grow older.
“Doctors warn: ‘Money can’t replace love.’ Critics say kids may struggle for identity in mega-family.”— @PoliticsWatch
Inside the mansion, daily life resembles an organized camp. Journalists who visited told Deutsche Welle they saw staff using walkie-talkies to coordinate meal prep for dozens of toddlers, while others supervised lessons in a private classroom. Nannies rotate shifts like hospital nurses, with clipboards tracking every diaper change. The young mother claims she personally tucks in at least some of the children each night, though critics doubt the logistics. “She is one woman,” one skeptic told The Economist. “She can’t possibly bond with 100 children.”
Financially, the family shows no signs of slowing. Coverage in Bloomberg revealed the couple spends over $100,000 per month on childcare, medical bills, and housing expenses. Their fortune, derived from international business holdings, has shielded them from the economic hardships facing ordinary families. But it also sparked outrage. Critics told FT that flaunting such wealth while raising children in bulk “turns family into a spectacle for profit.” Social media backlash included memes comparing the family to reality TV caricatures, with one viral comment calling them “The Human Factory.”
“Inside the mega-family: $100k a month, dozens of nannies, and vows to reach 100 children.”— @GlobalWatchNow
The controversy spread far beyond the internet. Religious leaders told TIME the family’s pursuit of quantity over quality clashed with spiritual principles of love and stewardship. “Children are not trophies,” one priest warned. Feminist groups criticized the glorification of extreme motherhood, arguing it reinforced stereotypes about women’s value being tied to reproduction. But others countered that her story represents reproductive freedom. “She chooses this path,” one activist told NBC News. “Choice means respecting even the choices we don’t understand.”
For the children themselves, the future remains uncertain. Sociologists told The Guardian that growing up in such a massive household could affect how siblings form bonds. “They may compete for attention or feel lost in the crowd,” one researcher explained. Yet others suggested the children could benefit from a built-in community, with dozens of siblings offering companionship. Videos posted on @EuromaidanPress showed toddlers laughing together in sprawling playrooms, while older siblings pushed strollers down long hallways. To some, the scene looked joyful; to others, overwhelming.
As the mother reiterated her vow to reach “at least 100 children,” the world remains divided between admiration and alarm. Her story raises questions about family, wealth, and morality in the modern era, leaving millions to debate whether this is an act of devotion, obsession, or spectacle. Yet for the woman herself, the answer is simple: “This is my dream. And I will not stop.”
LEAVE US A COMMENT
Comments
comments