In an unexpected turn, President Donald Trump publicly commended the “measured response” of US forces and urged renewed talks with Tehran, just hours after Iran launched ballistic and cruise missiles at Al-Asad Air Base in Iraq. Speaking from the Oval Office, Trump praised the readiness of US air defenses and stressed that “we cannot escalate into endless conflict” in his official statement.
@POTUS “Our forces acted swiftly and precisely—zero loss of life is testament to their professionalism. Now, we must seek a diplomatic path forward.” via X
Trump’s remarks diverged sharply from his earlier rhetoric, which promised “overwhelming force” in response to any Iranian aggression. Instead, he lauded the “impeccable” work of Patriot missile batteries and F-15E pilots, noting that “not a single aircraft was downed, thanks to cutting-edge defense systems” Reuters reported.
CNN’s national security correspondent emphasized the shift: “This is the first time Trump has publicly called for de-escalation since ordering airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites” CNN Politics. Indeed, Trump stated, “We saw restraint, we showed restraint. Now, let’s use that same discipline in diplomacy.”
@CNNPolitics “Trump’s call for talks marks a pivot—administration insiders say it reflects concerns over wider regional war.” via X
On the Hill, reactions were mixed. Senate Foreign Relations Chair Bob Menendez applauded Trump’s peace overture, telling Politico that “any step toward negotiations is welcome, but Congress must have oversight.” Meanwhile, Senator Lindsey Graham reiterated his hardline stance: “Talks only buoy the ayatollah—we must maintain pressure,” he tweeted.
@SenatorMenendez “Diplomacy cannot begin from bombing—thankfully, the President sees that today.” via X
Analysts note that Trump’s statement reflects concerns about the war’s spillover effects. A Council on Foreign Relations report warned of potential fuel-price shocks and destabilization in Iraq and Syria. Citing that study, Trump said, “Our people want security, not perpetual war. We must protect our economy and our soldiers.”
Internationally, allies welcomed the tone. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg praised the emphasis on restraint, stating on X that “strong defense must be balanced by active diplomacy” via X. France’s President Macron lauded Trump’s call for discussions, urging all parties to “return to the negotiating table” under the JCPOA framework.
@jensstoltenberg “Pleased to see US leadership combining deterrence with diplomacy—only then can we ensure lasting peace.” via X
Tehran’s government responded cautiously. In a statement on state news agency IRNA, Iran’s foreign ministry spokeperson said, “We note the President’s words. Our door to dialogue remains open, provided US actions match its rhetoric.” However, Iranian hardliners continued to demand punitive action, emphasizing that “words must be backed by lifting sanctions” IRNA report.
Financial markets reacted positively to Trump’s surprise pivot. Brent crude dipped 3% amid hopes of reduced regional risk, according to Bloomberg commodity data. Stock indices across Europe and Asia rallied on optimism that oil-price volatility would ease.
@markets “Oil prices fall as de-escalation hopes rise following Trump’s call for talks.” via X
Military planners, however, remain on alert. Pentagon spokesperson Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder told reporters, “While we welcome diplomatic overtures, our forces are postured to defend if needed.” He added the deployment of additional Patriot and THAAD batteries to protect US bases in the Gulf is ongoing DoD release.
Humanitarian concerns also surfaced. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs warned that “any sustained conflict threatens civilian infrastructure in Iraq” OCHA bulletin. Trump acknowledged these risks, urging “both sides to spare innocents and ensure humanitarian aid flows unimpeded.”
@UNOCHA “Civilians bear the brunt—dialogue is the only way to avert deeper humanitarian crises.” via X
Public sentiment appears split. A Pew poll shows 52% of Americans back diplomatic efforts over military escalation, while 38% fear talks signal weakness. Trump’s statement has fueled both camps: some praise the moderation; others worry it undermines deterrence.
Journalists note the political calculus: with midterms approaching, Trump’s embrace of diplomacy may appeal to moderate voters concerned about foreign entanglements, while allowing hawks to claim he maintains “the strongest military posture ever.” As one Washington Examiner editorial put it, “The President’s double-edged message walks a fine line between peace and preparedness” Washington Examiner.
Whether Trump’s surprising statement will lead to substantive talks remains uncertain. National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan announced a back-channel offer to Iranian counterparts, to be mediated by Oman, while Secretary of State Blinken reaches out to European partners to coordinate a unified diplomatic front.
As tensions ease slightly, both capitals face crucial decisions: will Iran reciprocate with concrete engagement, or will maximalists on both sides derail negotiations? And can Trump’s unexpected call for diplomacy withstand pressure from hardliners who view any concession as capitulation? One thing is clear: the world is watching to see if his words translate into a genuine de-escalation—one that honors his pledge to defend American interests without igniting a broader war.
